StackProtector: Use RuntimeLibcalls to query libcall names #147913
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jul 10, 2025
arsenm
requested review from
dpaoliello,
efriedma-quic,
pcc,
PiJoules,
eugenis and
MaskRay
arsenm
added
backend:ARM
backend:loongarch
backend:PowerPC
backend:X86
platform:openbsd
labels
Graphite App
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-nvptx @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm) ChangesThe compiler should not introduce calls to arbitrary strings This also avoids a random triple check in the pass. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147913.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index a954dde9fb223..f7598979ca4c5 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ defset list<RuntimeLibcall> LibCalls__OutOfLineAtomic = {
// Stack Protector Fail
def STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL : RuntimeLibcall;
+def STACK_SMASH_HANDLER : RuntimeLibcall;
// Deoptimization
def DEOPTIMIZE : RuntimeLibcall;
@@ -918,6 +919,9 @@ def bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def __bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def _Unwind_SjLj_Resume : RuntimeLibcallImpl<UNWIND_RESUME>;
+// Used on OpenBSD
+def __stack_smash_handler : RuntimeLibcallImpl<STACK_SMASH_HANDLER>;
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// F128 libm Runtime Libcalls
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
index 5f866eea7d4e7..3ec70083b7043 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
/// CreateFailBB - Create a basic block to jump to when the stack protector
/// check fails.
-static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip);
+static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI);
bool SSPLayoutInfo::shouldEmitSDCheck(const BasicBlock &BB) const {
return HasPrologue && !HasIRCheck && isa<ReturnInst>(BB.getTerminator());
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
// merge pass will merge together all of the various BB into one including
// fail BB generated by the stack protector pseudo instruction.
if (!FailBB)
- FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, TM->getTargetTriple());
+ FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, *TLI);
IRBuilder<> B(CheckLoc);
Value *Guard = getStackGuard(TLI, M, B);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
return HasPrologue;
}
-BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
+BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI) {
auto *M = F->getParent();
LLVMContext &Context = F->getContext();
BasicBlock *FailBB = BasicBlock::Create(Context, "CallStackCheckFailBlk", F);
@@ -716,17 +716,25 @@ BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
DILocation::get(Context, 0, 0, F->getSubprogram()));
FunctionCallee StackChkFail;
SmallVector<Value *, 1> Args;
- if (Trip.isOSOpenBSD()) {
- StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_smash_handler",
- Type::getVoidTy(Context),
+
+ if (const char *ChkFailName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL)) {
+ StackChkFail =
+ M->getOrInsertFunction(ChkFailName, Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ } else if (const char *SSHName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER)) {
+ StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction(SSHName, Type::getVoidTy(Context),
PointerType::getUnqual(Context));
Args.push_back(B.CreateGlobalString(F->getName(), "SSH"));
} else {
- StackChkFail =
- M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_chk_fail", Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ Context.emitError("no libcall available for stack protector");
}
- cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
- B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+
+ if (StackChkFail) {
+ cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
+ B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+ }
+
B.CreateUnreachable();
return FailBB;
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
index fdc183a6b09ce..f9bd9b6029234 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void RuntimeLibcallsInfo::initLibcalls(const Triple &TT,
if (TT.isOSOpenBSD()) {
setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL, RTLIB::Unsupported);
+ setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER, RTLIB::__stack_smash_handler);
}
if (TT.isOSWindows() && !TT.isOSCygMing()) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..f877d95dd3769
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+; RUN: not opt -disable-output -mtriple=nvptx64-- -enable-selectiondag-sp=0 -passes=stack-protector %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: error: no libcall available for stack protector
+define void @func() sspreq nounwind {
+ %alloca = alloca i32, align 4
+ call void @capture(ptr %alloca)
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare void @capture(ptr)
|
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm) ChangesThe compiler should not introduce calls to arbitrary strings This also avoids a random triple check in the pass. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147913.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index a954dde9fb223..f7598979ca4c5 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ defset list<RuntimeLibcall> LibCalls__OutOfLineAtomic = {
// Stack Protector Fail
def STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL : RuntimeLibcall;
+def STACK_SMASH_HANDLER : RuntimeLibcall;
// Deoptimization
def DEOPTIMIZE : RuntimeLibcall;
@@ -918,6 +919,9 @@ def bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def __bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def _Unwind_SjLj_Resume : RuntimeLibcallImpl<UNWIND_RESUME>;
+// Used on OpenBSD
+def __stack_smash_handler : RuntimeLibcallImpl<STACK_SMASH_HANDLER>;
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// F128 libm Runtime Libcalls
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
index 5f866eea7d4e7..3ec70083b7043 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
/// CreateFailBB - Create a basic block to jump to when the stack protector
/// check fails.
-static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip);
+static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI);
bool SSPLayoutInfo::shouldEmitSDCheck(const BasicBlock &BB) const {
return HasPrologue && !HasIRCheck && isa<ReturnInst>(BB.getTerminator());
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
// merge pass will merge together all of the various BB into one including
// fail BB generated by the stack protector pseudo instruction.
if (!FailBB)
- FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, TM->getTargetTriple());
+ FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, *TLI);
IRBuilder<> B(CheckLoc);
Value *Guard = getStackGuard(TLI, M, B);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
return HasPrologue;
}
-BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
+BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI) {
auto *M = F->getParent();
LLVMContext &Context = F->getContext();
BasicBlock *FailBB = BasicBlock::Create(Context, "CallStackCheckFailBlk", F);
@@ -716,17 +716,25 @@ BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
DILocation::get(Context, 0, 0, F->getSubprogram()));
FunctionCallee StackChkFail;
SmallVector<Value *, 1> Args;
- if (Trip.isOSOpenBSD()) {
- StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_smash_handler",
- Type::getVoidTy(Context),
+
+ if (const char *ChkFailName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL)) {
+ StackChkFail =
+ M->getOrInsertFunction(ChkFailName, Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ } else if (const char *SSHName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER)) {
+ StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction(SSHName, Type::getVoidTy(Context),
PointerType::getUnqual(Context));
Args.push_back(B.CreateGlobalString(F->getName(), "SSH"));
} else {
- StackChkFail =
- M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_chk_fail", Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ Context.emitError("no libcall available for stack protector");
}
- cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
- B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+
+ if (StackChkFail) {
+ cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
+ B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+ }
+
B.CreateUnreachable();
return FailBB;
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
index fdc183a6b09ce..f9bd9b6029234 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void RuntimeLibcallsInfo::initLibcalls(const Triple &TT,
if (TT.isOSOpenBSD()) {
setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL, RTLIB::Unsupported);
+ setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER, RTLIB::__stack_smash_handler);
}
if (TT.isOSWindows() && !TT.isOSCygMing()) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..f877d95dd3769
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+; RUN: not opt -disable-output -mtriple=nvptx64-- -enable-selectiondag-sp=0 -passes=stack-protector %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: error: no libcall available for stack protector
+define void @func() sspreq nounwind {
+ %alloca = alloca i32, align 4
+ call void @capture(ptr %alloca)
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare void @capture(ptr)
|
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm) ChangesThe compiler should not introduce calls to arbitrary strings This also avoids a random triple check in the pass. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147913.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
index a954dde9fb223..f7598979ca4c5 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.td
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ defset list<RuntimeLibcall> LibCalls__OutOfLineAtomic = {
// Stack Protector Fail
def STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL : RuntimeLibcall;
+def STACK_SMASH_HANDLER : RuntimeLibcall;
// Deoptimization
def DEOPTIMIZE : RuntimeLibcall;
@@ -918,6 +919,9 @@ def bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def __bzero : RuntimeLibcallImpl<BZERO>;
def _Unwind_SjLj_Resume : RuntimeLibcallImpl<UNWIND_RESUME>;
+// Used on OpenBSD
+def __stack_smash_handler : RuntimeLibcallImpl<STACK_SMASH_HANDLER>;
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// F128 libm Runtime Libcalls
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
index 5f866eea7d4e7..3ec70083b7043 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
/// CreateFailBB - Create a basic block to jump to when the stack protector
/// check fails.
-static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip);
+static BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI);
bool SSPLayoutInfo::shouldEmitSDCheck(const BasicBlock &BB) const {
return HasPrologue && !HasIRCheck && isa<ReturnInst>(BB.getTerminator());
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
// merge pass will merge together all of the various BB into one including
// fail BB generated by the stack protector pseudo instruction.
if (!FailBB)
- FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, TM->getTargetTriple());
+ FailBB = CreateFailBB(F, *TLI);
IRBuilder<> B(CheckLoc);
Value *Guard = getStackGuard(TLI, M, B);
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ bool InsertStackProtectors(const TargetMachine *TM, Function *F,
return HasPrologue;
}
-BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
+BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const TargetLowering &TLI) {
auto *M = F->getParent();
LLVMContext &Context = F->getContext();
BasicBlock *FailBB = BasicBlock::Create(Context, "CallStackCheckFailBlk", F);
@@ -716,17 +716,25 @@ BasicBlock *CreateFailBB(Function *F, const Triple &Trip) {
DILocation::get(Context, 0, 0, F->getSubprogram()));
FunctionCallee StackChkFail;
SmallVector<Value *, 1> Args;
- if (Trip.isOSOpenBSD()) {
- StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_smash_handler",
- Type::getVoidTy(Context),
+
+ if (const char *ChkFailName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL)) {
+ StackChkFail =
+ M->getOrInsertFunction(ChkFailName, Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ } else if (const char *SSHName =
+ TLI.getLibcallName(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER)) {
+ StackChkFail = M->getOrInsertFunction(SSHName, Type::getVoidTy(Context),
PointerType::getUnqual(Context));
Args.push_back(B.CreateGlobalString(F->getName(), "SSH"));
} else {
- StackChkFail =
- M->getOrInsertFunction("__stack_chk_fail", Type::getVoidTy(Context));
+ Context.emitError("no libcall available for stack protector");
}
- cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
- B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+
+ if (StackChkFail) {
+ cast<Function>(StackChkFail.getCallee())->addFnAttr(Attribute::NoReturn);
+ B.CreateCall(StackChkFail, Args);
+ }
+
B.CreateUnreachable();
return FailBB;
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
index fdc183a6b09ce..f9bd9b6029234 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void RuntimeLibcallsInfo::initLibcalls(const Triple &TT,
if (TT.isOSOpenBSD()) {
setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACKPROTECTOR_CHECK_FAIL, RTLIB::Unsupported);
+ setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::STACK_SMASH_HANDLER, RTLIB::__stack_smash_handler);
}
if (TT.isOSWindows() && !TT.isOSCygMing()) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..f877d95dd3769
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/no-stack-protector-libcall-error.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+; RUN: not opt -disable-output -mtriple=nvptx64-- -enable-selectiondag-sp=0 -passes=stack-protector %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: error: no libcall available for stack protector
+define void @func() sspreq nounwind {
+ %alloca = alloca i32, align 4
+ call void @capture(ptr %alloca)
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare void @capture(ptr)
|
|
ping |
Base automatically changed from
users/arsenm/runtime-libcalls/add-openbsd-stack-protector-tests
to
main
July 15, 2025 06:50
MaskRay
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2025
arsenm
force-pushed
the
users/arsenm/stack-protector/use-runtime-libcalls-for-libcall-names
branch
from
927865a to
9ae77cd
Compare
The compiler should not introduce calls to arbitrary strings that aren't defined in RuntimeLibcalls. Previously OpenBSD was disabling the default __stack_chk_fail, but there was no record of the alternative __stack_smash_handler function it emits instead. This also avoids a random triple check in the pass.
arsenm
force-pushed
the
users/arsenm/stack-protector/use-runtime-libcalls-for-libcall-names
branch
from
9ae77cd to
c312171
Compare
arsenm
deleted the
users/arsenm/stack-protector/use-runtime-libcalls-for-libcall-names
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The compiler should not introduce calls to arbitrary strings
that aren't defined in RuntimeLibcalls. Previously OpenBSD was
disabling the default __stack_chk_fail, but there was no record
of the alternative __stack_smash_handler function it emits instead.
This also avoids a random triple check in the pass.